I've had a love hate relationship with pan-species listing since I started doing it in late 2012. When I have a lot of free time, I love it. During my gap year I'd spend a lot of time at Stokes Field, taking photos of every insect, plant or fungi I found and then staying up until stupid o'clock identifying them all. Over time I began to learn more about taxonomic groups I'd never usually look at, and I got a little buzz from the satisfying feeling that came with securing the identification of something particularly obscure and tricky.
On the other hand, when I don't have the time or enthusiasm to scratch my head over the front femurs of a
Polydrusus weevil, a backlog starts to form that can be hard to keep on top of. I've been experiencing said pan-species lull for a while - not having entered a record since June 2014 according to the
PSL website.
|
9 out of 37 pages worth of lists.
|
A bout of competitive curiosity last week had me wondering just how extensive my list had become since then. There wasn't an easy way to work it out - a lot of wildlife-related things have happened since June 2014, and I spent several long nights trawling through all my photos and notes from Skokholm, Mull, Eigg and the like; picking out every species I possibly could and adding them to the list.
I hit the 2000 species milestone on Wednesday night with
Elachista albidella - a tiny micro moth found in a bog on Mull - and the common hoverfly
Eupoedes luniger became number 2001 the next morning; six months after I photographed it in the garden on a sunny spring afternoon.
|
Elachista albidella |
|
Eupoedes luniger |
How long this spell of listing enthusiasm will last, I'm not sure. The PSL recorders'
league table is fun, but it doesn't interest me as much as learning about the species itself. As soon as I find myself listing for the sake of climbing up the rankings, I'll know it's probably time to give it a break again.